Skip to main content

How the U.S. lost out on IPhone work


 
In 2012, The NY Times published an interesting article about Apple. For me it was so interesting and impressing. I thought we have to think and apply this issue in various ways. This article shows why the growth of Apple don’t continue to the growth of U.S. Finally they tell why it builds almost all of its stuff in China. There are some reasons.
 
[Character of China factory area]
Otherwise many people think, the cost is not only the reason. Some years ago, the China government supported building cities of factories that can hire 3,000 workers to live in a dorm per day about 8,700 Industrial Engineers in two weeks It would take about 9 months to do like this in the United States. Today, many devices require so lots of little parts that are all made in the same areas. The vast scale of overseas factories as well as the flexibility, diligence and industrial skills of foreign workers have outpaced their American counterparts so much that [Made in the U.S.] is no longer a viable option for most Apple products. As thinking to apply this way to U.S., it will be difficult.
 
[Information Technology Industry]
Originally IT industry is technology integrate enterprise. So it doesn’t need many human workers. it needs only high and high technology and a little workers who can supervise, care about and study. It means the growth of IT industry can not lead the growth of midwage jobs. Also ultimately, Apple executive said curing unemployment is not Apple's job and our only obligation is making the best product possible.
 
 
It tell us why Apple has to build their factory abroad. According to this issue and these days economic states, It will be the natural and fair process for other many global companies. So I think we have to prepare the action. People with midwage have to need re-education for more high job quality. And Government has to build fair and balanced policy to support this state.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chilsung Boatyard Café in Sokcho: A Waterfront Hangout with History

 A Hidden Café by Cheongcho Lake Tucked into a side street near Cheongcho Lake, Chilsung Boatyard Café (칠성조선소) doesn’t look like much from the entrance. But once you step inside, the space opens up to wide grounds filled with renovated shipyard buildings and a large container repurposed into a café From Shipyard to Cultural Space The site used to be a functioning boatyard. Today, the original buildings remain but have been transformed into a mix of a gallery, seating areas, and unique outdoor benches made from shipyard parts. It reminded me a little of Joyangbangjik in Ganghwa, another industrial space turned cultural landmark. Lakeside Vibes and Open-Air Seating On a sunny day, the café gets lively with people sipping coffee outdoors while looking out over the water. The view of Sokcho city and the lake makes it easy to lose track of time. What I Tried Inside the container café, the ceilings are high and the second floor has large glass windows facing the lake. The front seats a...

이메일 마케팅(Email Marketing)에 대한 따끈따끈한 리포트 및 인사이트

모바일 및 웹 비즈니스 분석 서비스 기업 믹스패널(Mixpanel)의 뉴스레터를 구독하여 종종 소식을 받아보곤 합니다. 그러던 중 지난 3월에 포스팅된 블로그 글이 흥미로워 재밌는 부분 한글로 몇 가지 부분 공유합니다. 믹스패널에서는 4년이 넘게 이메일 오픈율 패턴에 관한 연구를 진행했지만 빠르게 변화하는 인터넷 환경 때문에 새로운 인사이트가 필요했던 것 같습니다. 약 18개월 동안의 72,161개의 이메일 캠페인 데이터를 기반으로 한 믹스패널의 인사이트를 살펴보는 시간을 갖도록 합니다. 정말 엄청난 데이터네요. 웹 비즈니스 분석 툴을 서비스하는 기업인만큼 데이터량도 어마어마 합니다. Marketo, Responsys, Eloqua, GetResponse, 스티비, 오즈메일러, 비즈메일러 등 이메일 마케팅에 관련된 어플리케이션을 사용하고 계신다면 참고하셔도 좋은 자료입니다. 총 발송 숫자에 관한 평균 오픈율은? 발송 타겟 숫자(Sends)가 40억이 넘는 엄청난 데이터를 가지고 있네요. 그에 대한 평균 오픈율은 약 13.5%라고 합니다. 언뜻 보기에는 낮아 보이지만이는 평균값입니다. 값들의 차이가 너무 극명하게 나다보면 평균값이 무의미할 때가 종종 있습니다. 그래서 중간값도 제시해주고 있는데 바로 19.9%입니다. 이메일을 담당하고 있는 마케터들에게 공평한 목표 수치로 적용될 수 있으니 참고하시기 바랍니다. 중간값의 의미란? 본 리포트는 R 언어 기반으로 하여 데이터 분석을 실행히습니다. 평균값이 아닌 중간값을 한번 볼까요? 오픈율의 중간값을 19.9% 입니다. 4027명 중에 743명이 열어봤다는 것의 의미는 19.9%가 아니다. 이메일을 열어보는 것보다 보내는 것의 분배가 더 크다는 것을 보여줍니다. 그럼에도 750이 주는 의미 > 좋은 오픈율을 얻기 위해서는 많이 오픈해야 하낟. 이메일을 구독하지 않은 사람들보다 이메일을 열어서 10%시간을 할애안사람들이 훨씬 가치있다. 그 이상의 숫자가 나오지 않을 경우...

Future with Iot in CES 2015

This video shows the use trend of the future of our information systems. Yoon CEO explains how to invest and develop for Samsung about the future IoT applications. And Samsung's most devices within the next 15 years will be a form to IoT. And he predicts that it will all device accepts the IoT.   [Effective expectation with IoT] Providing a human-centered technology is the core point of IoT. The example is a chair with the sensor. Recognizing situations where the user is ready to sit with a microphone and monitor executed immediately. This also means that things be digitized come to life. And those things are helping to protect himself with the function of a tool.   [For the infinite development of IoT] Jeremy Rifkin says the era of IoT is a super connectivity age. The devices themselves without human effort can apply and remove something efficiently. Of course, this condition is necessary to some condition. Breaking down the boundaries of each company,...